← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/10369/2018disposed of

Gurminder Singh v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2018-05-09Mr. Justice Rameshwar Singh Malik2 pages

CWP No.10369 OF 2018 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10369 OF 2018 DECIDED ON: MAY 09, 2018 GURMINDER SINGH .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

Present:

Mr. Shubham Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** JASPAL SINGH, J.

By virtue of instant petition, preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of a writ especially in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to rectify the error in their records pertaining to his designation from Assistant Sub-Inspector to SubInspector in consonance with his promotional order dated 02.02.2016 and to disburse the retiral benefits as per his entitlement i.e. towards the post in the rank of Sub-Inspector.

2.

At the very outset of the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that though representation dated 29.01.2018 (P-6) was moved to the respondents but till date neither any reply to the said representation has been received nor any conscious decision has been taken by the respondents.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that he feels satisfied in case direction is issued to respondent No.4 to decide his Sonika 2018.05.11 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.10369 OF 2018 --2-- representation (P-6) in a time bound manner. 4.

Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4-Additional Director General of Police, Armed Battalions, Jalandhar, Cantt Jalandhar, Punjab to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in representation (P-6) and to take a conscious decision in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

5.

However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the aforesaid authority, he shall be at liberty to have recourse to the remedies available under law as well as to approach this Court. MAY 09, 2018 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No Sonika 2018.05.11 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh