Pakhar Singh Panag v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 112 Civil Writ Petition No.16693 of 2015 (O & M) Date of Decision: August 13, 2015 Pakhar Singh Panag ..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

State of Punjab & others ..... RESPONDENT(S) . . .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH . . .

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? . . .

PRESENT: - None.

. . .

Surya Kant, J (Oral) 1.

The petitioner's grievance is that private respondent Nos.6 to 9 have allegedly encroached upon the land of village pond and no action is being taken against them by respondent No.5 - Gram Panchayat of village Salana Dulla Singhwala, Tehsil Amloh, District Fatehgarh Sahib or the authorities like respondent No.4 - Block Development & Panchayats Officer, Amloh.

2.

Having regard to the nature of relief sought therein, we dispose of this petition, without expressing any views on merits as AVIN KUMAR 2015.08.18 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh

CWP No.16693 of 2015 [2] private respondents have not been heard at this stage and no order prejudicial to their interest can be passed, with a direction to respondent Nos.4 and 5 to look into the grievance of petitioner and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (Surya Kant) Judge (Jaspal Singh) August 13, 2015 Judge avin AVIN KUMAR 2015.08.18 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh