High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/14678/2024disposed of

Shyam Phutela v. Ut Of Chandigarh And ORS

2024-07-01Mr. Justice Arun Palli,Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal2 pages

C.W.P. No. 14678 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

C.W.P. No. 14678 of 2024 Date of decision: 01.07.2024 Shyam Phutela .... Petitioner Vs.

State of U.T. and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL

Present:

Mr. Vinod Chaudhari, Advocate for the petitioner.

ARUN PALLI, J (Oral) A certiorari is prayed for to quash the impugned letter dated 29.05.2024 (P-1), vide which the Chandigarh Housing Board (Board) has rejected the application moved by the respondent No.4 (Shiv Kumar), seeking 'No Objection Certificate' (NOC) for sale of lease rights in dwelling unit No.3307, Sector 47-D, Chandigarh (EWS Category). Apparently, the request of respondent No.4 (Shiv Kumar) was rejected by the Board as there was third party interest involved in the transaction.

Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be permitted to withdraw the petition so as to enable the petitioner to move the respondent Board qua his concerns/grievances by submitting a representation appended therewith all necessary documents.

Served with the advance copy of the petition, Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Advocate, is present in Court on behalf of the respondent-U.T. Chandigarh. At the outset, on instructions, she submits that in the event any such representation is moved, the same shall be taken cognizance of by the respondent Board. And appropriate orders, in accordance with law, shall be passed thereon within a period of eight weeks therefrom. Further, she submits that before any such orders are passed, the petitioner shall also be DEEPAK KUMAR 2024.07.02 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh

C.W.P. No. 14678 of 2024 afforded an opportunity of hearing. And a formal communication in this regard will be issued to him, well in advance. In the wake of the statements made by learned counsel for the parties, the petition is accordingly disposed of. (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE 01.07.2024 deepak Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2024.07.02 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh