Satish Kumar v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12275-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 17.02.2023 SATISH KUMAR ....Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present :

Mr. R.V.S. Chugh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Advocate and Mr. Rishav Jain, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that the petitioner as per the admitted case came in employment only on 16.04.2007. As per the policy decision relied upon by the petitioner, the requisite length of service was 10 years and, thus, he would not be covered under the said policy. Apart from that the petitioner has unfortunately expired during the pendency of the present writ petition.

Resultantly, the present writ petition is ordered to be dismissed. February 17, 2023 (PANKAJ JAIN) Dpr JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2023.02.27 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document