High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/10555/2018disposed of

Ramesh Chand v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

2018-04-30Mr. Justice Rameshwar Singh Malik2 pages

CWP No.10555 OF 2018 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10555 OF 2018 DECIDED ON: APRIL 30, 2018 RAMESH CHAND .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

Present:

Mr. Virinder K. Shukla, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** JASPAL SINGH, J.

By virtue of instant petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to count the service rendered by him as Supervisor in Adult Education Scheme as qualifying service for pensionary benefits. And further to grant the revised pensionary benefits after counting his service and to give the consequent arrears of revised pensionary benefits along with interest thereon @ 12% p.a.

At the very outset of the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though demand notice dated 27.02.2018 (P-6) was duly served upon the respondents but till date neither any response has been received nor any decision has been taken thereon. He further submits that petitioner feels satisfied in case direction is issued to respondents to consider and decide the Sonika 2018.05.03 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.10555 OF 2018 --2-- afore-said legal notice (P-6), within a stipulated period. 3.

Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Director Public Instructions (SE), Punjab, Complex Punjab School Education Board, Sector 62, SAS Nagar, Mohali to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in demand notice dated 27.02.2018 (P-6) and to decide the same strictly in accordance with Rules, regulations and instructions as well as in view of judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 5526 of 2012, dated 26.04.2017 (P-5), within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4.

However, if petitioners still feel aggrieved by any order of the aforesaid authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available under law as well as to approach this Court. APRIL 30, 2018 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No Sonika 2018.05.03 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh