Mohinder Singh And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.12343 of 2017 Date of decision: 04.07.2017 Mohinder Singh and others ..Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ..Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

Present:

Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate for the petitioners.

*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is that they are entitled for payment of travelling allowance but in spite of serving legal notice, neither any relief has been granted nor any action has been taken.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case, directions are issued to the respondents to decide legal notice dated 28.04.2016 (Annexure P-1). Keeping in view the limited prayer of the petitioners and without commenting anything on the merits of the case at this stage, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider the legal notice (Annexure P-1) and take necessary action in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

In case, the petitioners are found to be entitled for the relief Neetu Rani 2017.07.11 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.12343 of 2017 sought in the legal notice, the same be released to them within a period of two months thereafter. In case, the petitioners are not found to be entitled then respondent No.3 is directed to pass a well reasoned speaking order and the petitioners are at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy. 04.07.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE √ Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No √ Whether Reportable Yes/No Neetu Rani 2017.07.11 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh