← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/5843/2024disposed of

Aanchal And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others

2024-06-27Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary2 pages

 

       CRWP-5843-2024

   

 

 

 



! State of Punjab and Others  "

#           

    "

$  %&

 

#

 

     

'"()(*( + 



  ,      

 ## 

%   ,   

-   .!

(

$ 

 %!/0   

0!  . #  '")(12( 1.

The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members. 2.

Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if the Senior Superintendent of Police, Distrcit SAS Nagar, Mohali i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 18.06.2024 (Annexure P-4), made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. 3.

As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major and their dates of birth are 21.09.2005 and 26.02.2000, respectively. Copy of Affidavit regarding proof of age of petitioner No.1 and Aadhar card of petitioner No.2 are appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively. They got married on MOHIT 2024.06.27 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRWP-5843-2024 

14.06.2024 and the Marriage Certificate is enclosed with the petition as Annexure A-2.

4.

Notice of motion.

5.

At the asking of the Court,   #

34  -

% 5!0 / accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has no objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. 6.

In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of their claim, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 18.06.2024 (Annexure P-4) and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law.

7.

It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against them if there is some evidence that surfaces regarding their involvement in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the investigating agency        

 !

"

6 ,

)

#

$47

   79 )



#

/

  79 MOHIT 2024.06.27 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment