M/S Shreme Advertising Registered Office 16/6, Yadav Complex, Faridabad v. State Of Haryana And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.15984 of 2016 Date of Decision.07.02.2017 M/s Shreme Advertising .......Petitioner Vs State of Haryana and another ........Respondents
Present:
Mr. Yash Dev Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the 2nd respondent-Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Faridabad to take appropriate action on the representation dated 29.07.2016 (Annexure P-4) within a stipulated period. Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct the 2nd respondent-Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Faridabad to consider the representation dated 29.07.2016 (Annexure P-4) within a period two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall pass a speaking order thereon.
The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE February 07, 2017 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.02.08 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document