Laxmi Kant & ORS v. State Of Punjab & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 15990 of 2016 Decided on : 25.10.2016 Laxmi Kant and others . . . Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Amandeep Kansal, Advocate for Mr. Lakhwinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Kavita Arora, Advocate for respondents No.6 to 8.

Mr. Arun Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.9.

Mr. M.K. Singla, Advocate for respondent No.10.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for respondents No.6 to 8 states that in terms of order dated 28th September, 2016, an affidavit has been filed in the Registry. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in view of the removal of illegal encroachments, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.

3.

Ordered accordingly.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) October 25, 2016 JUDGE J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2016.10.26 15:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh