Lalita v. State Of Haryana & ORS

CWP-16013-2016 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-16013-2016 Date of decision: - 04.09.2019 Lalita ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: - Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakhshi, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) In the present writ petition, the claim which is being raised by the petitioner is that her late husband was entitled for regularization of his services with effect from the date his juniors were regularized. Counsel for the respondents, on instructions from Sh. Rajesh Vats, Divisional Forest Officer, Sonepat, states that request of the petitioner for regularizing the services of her late husband w.e.f. 01.10.2003 has already been accepted by the competent authority and the Divisional Forest Officer, Sonepat, will pass an appropriate order granting the said relief to the late husband of the petitioner within a period of seven days from today and further all the consequential reliefs arising out of the said order will also be released to the petitioner within a period of two months thereafter. NARESH KUMAR 2019.09.09 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-16013-2016 -2Counsel for the petitioner states that keeping in view the statement given by counsel for the respondents in respect of the grant of relief to the petitioner as being claimed in the present writ petition alongwith the consequential benefits, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Ordered accordingly.

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) September 04, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2019.09.09 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh