High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/8383/2021disposed of

Aarti And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

2021-09-03Mr. Justice Raj Mohan Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.8383 of 2021 Date of Decision:03.09.2021 AARTI AND ANOTHER ......Petitioners Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present:Mr. S.S Nain, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this is the first marriage between the petitioners.

Petitioners have prayed for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents for protecting their civil/personal rights and liberties from being invaded by the private respondents. Petitioners are alleged to have solemnized marriage on 02.09.2021 on attaining the age of majority. They feel reasonable apprehension and threat perception at the hands of the private respondents and pray that their

personal/civil rights be not violated by them. Precisely, in the context of aforesaid relief, petitioners have approached the Superintendent of Police, District Kaithal/respondent No.2 by way of representation dated 01.09.2021, which is stated to have been moved before respondent No.2 a day prior to the date of marriage through Email. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Rajat Gautam, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of State-respondents No.1 to 3.

At this stage, without meaning anything in the context of validity of marriage and majority of the petitioners, it would be just and appropriate to direct respondent No.2 to look into the grievance of the petitioners and pass an appropriate order on merits in accordance with law. Respondent No.2 would pass necessary order without being influenced by any pleadings made in the petition.

This order shall not debar the official respondents from proceeding against any of the parties, if they are involved in any other case. It would be appreciated if the needful is done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

(RAJ MOHAN SINGH) 03.09.2021 JUDGE Amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No