Tirlok Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

2023:PHHC:074067 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No. 16794 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.05.2023 Tirlok Singh ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Vishnav Gandhi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

The petitioner, on attaining the age of superannuation, retired on 31.03.2020. He prays for the issuance of the writ of mandamus directing the respondents to count his service w.e.f. 05.11.1982 instead of 06.02.1990. In fact, the petitioner's claim was rejected by a specific order passed on 10.06.2015, whereas the writ petition has been filed in the month of July 2022. He also challenges the communication dated 07.02.2022 whereby his request for inclusion of his name in the seniority list has been rejected. 2.

As already noticed, this writ petition was filed in the month of July, 2022, whereas, the impugned order was passed on 10.06.2015. Moreover, the respondents, while filing the reply, have asserted that the petitioner was reappointed on 23.04.1990. The petitioner has failed to disclose the terms of his re-appointment.

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2023.05.25 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

2023:PHHC:074067 Civil Writ Petition No. 16794 of 2022 (O&M) 3.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, no ground is made out to issue the writ. Hence, the present writ petition is dismissed. 4.

The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge May 22, 2023 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2023.05.25 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document