Darshan Lal And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-12596-2017 (O & M) Date of decision: 14.03.2019 Darshan Lal and ors.

.... Petitioners V/s State of Punjab and anr.

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Anu Chatrath, Addl.A.G., Punjab.

***** Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel has referred to Para 03 of the short affidavit dated 06.09.2017. Same reads as under:- "3. That it is respectfully submitted that the Principals upto seniority no 290 were considered for the posting of District Education Officers. For the sake of Clarity facility of this Hon'ble Court, the seniority positions of petitioners in the P.E.S. Cadre is explained as under:- Sr. No.

Petitioner Name Seniority No.

Remarks 1.

Darshan Lal Vocational Stream 2.

Dinesh Kumar Vocational Stream 3.

Pritam Singh Vocational Stream 4.

Amarjit Singh Vocational Stream 5.

Rashpal Singh Vocational Stream Learned State counsel further submits that in view of the fact that mistake has been rectified, present petition has been rendered infructuous.

SUKHPREET KAUR 2019.04.06 14:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document This contention remains uncontroverted.

CWP-12596-2017 (O & M) ::2::

In view of the above, present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

(RAJAN GUPTA) March 14, 2019 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2019.04.06 14:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document