M/S Lakshay And Company v. Gurugram Metropolitan Development Authority And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.16721 of 2020 Date of decision: 09.10.2020 (Heard through Video Conferencing) M/s Lakshay & Company ..Petitioner

Versus

Gurugram Metropolican Development Authority and others ..Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. AG, Haryana.

*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that same direction be issued in this case as issued by the Division Bench of this Court on 07.10.2020 in CWP No.16401 of 2020 titled as M/s Lakshay and Company vs. Gurugram Metropolitan Development Authority and others. Learned State counsel submits that the technical bid has been opened and the case of the petitioner has been rejected but final bid has not been opened so far.

It can be said that no final decision has been taken so far. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petition filed by the petitioner be treated as a representation and decision be taken by considering the averments made therein by the respondent-authorities NEETU RANI 2020.10.13 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC

CWP No.16721 of 2020 -2- .......

before taking any final decision on the financial bid as directed in other similar matter i.e. CWP No.16401 of 2020 as mentioned above. However, it is made clear that the observation made hereinabove shall not have any bearing on the merits of the case. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 09.10.2020 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2020.10.13 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC