Sachin @ Sheenu And Others v. State Of Haryana And Another

JYOTI 2025.11.11 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-27944-2025 (O&M) On the basis of statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted his report dated 14.07.2025 and submitted that as per the statement of the parties, the compromise (Annexure P-2) effected between them appears to be genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State Counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR No.108 dated 10.03.2025.

Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench Judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.108 dated 10.03.2025, under Sections 115, 190, 191(2), 296, 299, 302 and 351(3) of BNS, registered at Police Station Hisar City, District Hisar, are quashed qua the petitioners.

(SUKHVINDER KAUR) 10.11.2025 JUDGE jyoti3 Whether reasoned/speaking:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No JYOTI 2025.11.11 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document