Dharam Veer v. Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 24.08.2015 CWP No. 17543 of 2015 Dharam Veer +Petitioner

Versus

Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. and ors. +Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU Present: 5 Mr.Balraj Singh Rathee, Advocate for the petitioner.

 
 

The petitioner has filed this writ petition claiming that the candidates, who are not only lower in merit, but also absented from the interview, have been selected against the vacant posts of Assistant Lineman in BC5A category. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that he has also sent legal notice dated 12.01.2015 claiming appointment against the post of BC5A category to respondent No.1 , but no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that at this stage, he would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.1 to take action on his legal notice. Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1to take into consideration legal notice dated Dinesh Kumar 2015.09.11 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No. 17543 of 2015 12.01.2015 (Annexure P513) and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

24.08.2015 (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) dinesh JUDGE Dinesh Kumar 2015.09.11 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh