Arvinder Singh v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2024:PHHC:057996

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP- 13047-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision:29.04.2024 ARVINDER SINGH

...Petitioner

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab Mr. Saurabh Singh, Advocate for MR. Pardeep Bajaj, Advocate for respondents No. 3 to 5.

Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.6.

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to take remedial action on the enquiry report dated 01.01.2016 (Annexure P-1), submitted by the Enquiry Officer. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that during the pendency of the instant writ petition, the respondents conducted an enquiry and a report dated 26.05.2017 (Annexure R-6/4) had been submitted. He seeks withdrawal of the instant writ petition so as to take recourse to alternative remedy and to adopt the proceedings against aforesaid enquiry report dated 26.05.2017.

DINESH KUMAR 2024.05.01 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at the bottom of left side

CWP- 13047-2017 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:057996 -2Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the same.

Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. All miscellaneous applications, if any, pending, stand disposed of accordingly.

( VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ) JUDGE 29.04.2024 dinesh 1.Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes 2.Whether reportable?

Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2024.05.01 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at the bottom of left side