High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/2085/2013disposed of

Gurpreet Kaur v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

2016-07-29Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

C.W.P No. 2085 of 2013 DATE OF DECISION: 29.07.2016 Gurpreet Kaur ..........Petitioner

Versus

Punjab School Education Board and another ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. PK Goklaney, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shekhar Verma, Advocate for respondent No.2.

**** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner undertakes not to claim anything in case fresh appointment is given to her. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 on instructions from Mr. Shiv Kumar, Deputy Secretary Accounts submits that respondentDepartment has decided to give fresh appointment to the petitioner. Necessary action be taken within a period of one month. It is also made clear that respondent No.2 shall not be effected in any manner in view of undertaking given by the petitioner. In view of the above, nothing survives in the petition and the same is disposed of accordingly.

July 29, 2016 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No