High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/11444/2018disposed of

Js Khetri And ORS. v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

2019-03-05Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

CWP-11444-2018 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-11444-2018 Date of decision: - 05.03.2019 J.S. Kharti and others ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Sandeep Singal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Safia Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. R.D. Bawa, Advocate, for respondents No.15 to 18. None for the remaining respondents.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed seeking restoration of Ad-hoc Relief, which was granted to the petitioners by the Government of Haryana.

In support of the claim, the petitioners are relying upon the judgments of this Court passed in CWP No. 4518 of 2000, dated 11.08.2003 (Annexure P-4), CWP No. 16084 of 1997, dated 27.07.2000 (Annexure P-5) and judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court passed in Civil Appeal No.8661 of 2009, dated 08.12.2015 (Annexure P-6). Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in order to claim the relief, as prayed in the present writ petition, the petitioners have NARESH KUMAR 2019.03.12 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-11444-2018 -2served the respondents with legal notices dated 01.12.2017; 06.12.2017; 24.01.2018 and 02.02.2018 (Annexure P-8 {colly.}), but the same have not been decided so far.

Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied, in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide their legal notices dated 01.12.2017; 06.12.2017; 24.01.2018 and 02.02.2018 (Annexure P-8 {colly.}) sent to the respondents. Counsel for the respondent(s)-State states that she has no objection with regard to the prayer made by counsel for the petitioners for passing of the appropriate orders on the legal notice dated 01.12.2017; 06.12.2017; 24.01.2018 and 02.02.2018 (Annexure P-8 {colly.}), submitted by the petitioners, in a time bound manner. In view of the above, without going into the merits of the case and without commenting upon the entitlement of the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the legal notices dated 01.12.2017; 06.

12.2017; 24.01.2018 and 02.02.2018 (Annexure P-8 {colly.}) of the petitioners by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) March 05, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2019.03.12 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh