← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/33267/2022disposed of

Kuldeep Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another

2023-02-09Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger2 pages

 

 --

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH  (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.02.2023 

....Petitioner

Versus

    

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present :

Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

  



 !" HARSH BUNGER, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C is for grant of concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.117 dated 18.06.2022 registered under Section 379 of IPC, 1860 and under Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals Act, 1957 at Police Station Sadar Fazilka (Annexure P-1).

On 01.08.2022, the following order was passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court :-  



  

 

  

  



    

  !!! 



 "  #  $ 

#  % &"' #  !(  ) 

 )   * &+  , 



(  

  

    

   

 



  

    -  (.

-  # 

# /#0 

# /1

0 

 

 

   

  (           

 2

  )

    '

  $      

   0     

  

   

 

    0  (   

 0    -   



    (- (4!!! ) 0    

 



 

 5  3

 

AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2023.02.10 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

 

 -#-

( 

    

     

   -     

( (3

 6((  7*

6((   5     

   3



 #  4% 8!9'"' :0    

      

 0   ;



   5

 



   

           

3

  0 (     < Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Devender Singh has not disputed the aforesaid fact of joining the investigation by the petitioner and submits that his custodial interrogation is not required at this stage.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required at this stage, the present petition is allowed and the ad-interim order dated 01.08.2022 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

It is made clear that if the petitioner fails to comply with any of the directions made above and the bail conditions, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of this anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner.

The petition is accordingly disposed of.

09.02.2023 (HARSH BUNGER) Amandeep JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

Yes/No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2023.02.10 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document