Ankit v. State Of Haryana And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33307-2022 Date of Decision: 13.01.2023 Ankit ......... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another ........ Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Ankit Bishnoi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajat Gautam, D.A.G, Haryana.
Mr. D.S. Matya, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner submits that the statement made by counsel for respondent No. 2/accused, which has been reflected in para 6 of the bail order dated 04.07.2022 passed by this Court in CRM-M-27471-2022 was misconception of fact and was a false statement and absolutely contradicted to the ground relates. Counsel for respondent No. 2 has referred to para No. 7 of the bail petition to this effect.
On perusal of para 7 of the bail reveals that although a reference has been made about misleading statement but details are absent. Faced with this, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars. The present petition stands disposed of having been withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
It is clarified that filing and withdrawal of the present petition shall not come in the way in case fresh petition is filed.
All pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 13.01.2023 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2023.01.16 11:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.