Parmjit Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab And Another

-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.37958 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:14.02.2022 Parmjit Singh and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Present:- Mr. Raminder Singh Joon, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. A.S. Gill, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

Mr. H.S. Batth, Advocate for the complainant.

-.- JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) 1.

This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of FIR No.49 dated 26.04.2018 registered under Sections 420, 120-B IPC at Police Station Chohla Sahib, District Tarn Taran (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom in view of the compromise dated 17.08.2021 (Annexure P-2). 2.

The FIR has been registered on the statement of complainant on the allegations that the petitioners herein have played fraud upon the complainant on the pretext of sending him abroad. Now with the intervention of respectable persons, the matter has been amicably compromised between the parties and they have resolved their disputes and differences.

3.

Keeping in view the fact that the parties have entered into a compromise, they were directed to appear before the trial court/Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded in support of the

-2compromise. In pursuance of the direction, a report has been received from JMIC, Tarn Taran stating that the compromise arrived at between the parties is without any pressure or coercion from any one and the same is genuine one.

4.

Learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab on instructions from the Investigating Officer and learned counsel for the complainant-respondent No.2 admit the factum of compromise. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State submits that in case the parties have indeed settled their dispute, the State would have no objection to the quashing of the FIR, in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record.

6.

In a decision, based on compromise, none of the parties is a loser. Rather, a compromise not only brings peace and harmony between the parties to a dispute, but also restores tranquility in the society. After considering the nature of offences allegedly committed and the fact that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute, continuance of criminal prosecution would be an exercise in futility, as the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak.

7.

Consequently, keeping in view the fact that the dispute has been amicably settled and in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 466, this petition is allowed and FIR No.49 dated 26.04.2018 registered under Sections 420, 120-B IPC at Police Station

-3Chohla Sahib, District Tarn Taran (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed qua petitioners. February 14, 2022 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Pankaj* JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No