Akhil Saxena And ORS. v. Medical Council Of India And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-11639-2018 (O & M) Date of decision: 05.12.2018 Dr. Akhil Saxena and ors.

.... Petitioner(s) V/s Medical Council of India and ors.

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. M.S. Longia, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Amrit Paul, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. O.P. Dabla, Sr. Panel Counsel for respondent No.3-UOI. ***** RAJAN GUPTA , J. (Oral) Petitioners have impugned order dated 27.04.2018, Annexure P-29. It is contended that the aforesaid order is totally non-speaking and cryptic. The authority has not assigned any reasons while passing the impugned order, thus, failed to comply with the principles of natural justice. He, thus, prays that the matter be remitted to the same authority for decision afresh. This prayer is not opposed by the counsel representing the respondents.

In view of the fact that the impugned order, Annexure P-29, is non-speaking and does not contain detailed reasons for removal of the names of the petitioners from the State Register, same is hereby set aside. Matter is remitted to the same authority for a decision afresh after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties. The concerned authority shall pass orders afresh at the earliest, in any case, not later than two months. Allowed in these terms.

(RAJAN GUPTA) December 05, 2018 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2018.12.06 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document