Shirpal v. State Of Haryana

 CRM-M-38140-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38140-2021 Date of decision: 27.04.2022 Shripal

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent



   

 



 
 



 
 

 



  



 
 
!


   

       " 


  

  
#
 $
%$ 

%
&'

 ())
 
* +* ,+,+
  

  -*
-)
(,(

.+/
'0

 
(,.

(+1
'0
2
$ 
3 
$
  

 

$


  
 

 
 4
$$ $
 % 


  





5 $   



%
$
 

$ 
%


5
 

5 $



  
&'

 (1*
 
+1 +* ,+,+ 
 
-*
-)
(,(
-.,

.+/
'0
$
  
   

  
 

5 $
 

$
 
 


$$ 
 #
$

+- +* ,+,+
%


&'


  
 * +* ,+,+6

$$



$
%
$

%$
 

 a case of version and cross-version and it is yet to be ascertained as to which party was the aggressor one. Learned counsel further contends PARVEEN KUMAR 2022.04.27 06:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

, CRM-M-38140-2021 that the prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined, and that the petitioner has already undergone a period of more than 01 year. On the other hand, learned State counsel, while opposing the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner had caused injury on the head of the complainant. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The alleged occurrence took place on 04.08.2020, but the present FIR was registered on 18.08.2020. Moreover, on the complaint of the petitioner, FIR No.378 dated 07.08.2020, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452 and 506 IPC, Police Station Sadar Sonipat, has also been registered against the complainant party.

It is a case of version and cross-version and it is yet to be ascertained as to which party was the aggressor one. "
  

$
 
5

+


Out of 19 prosecution witnesses, 06 witnesses have been examined.


%$

 
%


   


$
$ 0 78 
   

27.04.2022    




#5    9 
7 # :
;7 9 
  %$:
;7 PARVEEN KUMAR 2022.04.27 06:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document