Subhash Bagri v. State Of Haryana & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.21199 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.05.2015 Subhash Bagri ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.

Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?

2.

To be referred to reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. Rakesh K. Kaundal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the grievance of the petitioner has been vindicated.

Ordered accordingly.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE May 13, 2015 savita SAVITA DEVI KADIAN 2015.05.13 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh