Neha v. Chief Manager, State Bank Of Patiala And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17019 of 2016 Date of decision: November 09, 2016 Neha ....Petitioner versus The Chief Manager, State Bank of Patiala and others .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN *****

Present:

Mr. Saurabh Khurana, Advocate for Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ****** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The challenge in this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 17.07.2016 (Annexure P-6) passed by respondent No.1 vide which the representation filed by the petitioner has been rejected. Further prayer has also been made to direct the respondents either to hand over the possession of the property purchased in open auction or to consider for refund of the amount of ` 16,10,000/- deposited for the purchase of the property in question along with interest @ 18% p.a. 2.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner states that since certain questions of fact are required to be established by leading evidence, therefore, he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition. However, a prayer was made that liberty be granted to the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedies as may be available to her, in accordance with law. Sonia Kinra 2016.11.11 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

Civil Writ Petition No.17019 of 2016 -2- ---- 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to her, in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) November 09, 2016 JUDGE sonia gugnani Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No Sonia Kinra 2016.11.11 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh