Union Bank Of India v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 17182 of 2016 Decided on : 24.08.2016 Union Bank of India . . . Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Munish Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that inadvertently, the plaintiffs who had filed the Civil Suit, claiming themselves to be the tenants in the disputed property have not been impleaded as respondents in the present writ petition. Therefore, he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action by impleading the said persons as respondents in the writ petition.

2.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) August 24, 2016 JUDGE J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2016.08.26 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh