Vinod Garg v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-11974-2018 (O & M) Date of decision: 31.05.2018 Vinod Garg .... Petitioner V/s State of Punjab and ors.

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Aditya Sharda, AAG, Punjab.

***** Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral) Reply by way of affidavit of of Sukhwinder Singh, Superintendent, Central Jail, Bathinda, has been filed in court today. Same is taken on record.

Petitioner has applied for parole on the ground that his daughter has been operated upon in Max Super Speciality Hospital, Bathinda. Petitioner is stated to be in custody being a convict under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

Learned State counsel submits that, in case, any application is moved by the petitioner for emergency parole, it shall be considered by the concerned authority at the earliest, in any case, not later than ten days. In view of statement made by learned State counsel, no further order is necessary. Petition is hereby disposed of. A copy of the order be forwarded to the concerned Jail Superintendent forthwith.

(RAJAN GUPTA) May 31, 2018 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sukhpreet Kaur 2018.06.02 06:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document