← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/12019/2018disposed of

Ram Charan v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2018-05-14Mr. Justice Rameshwar Singh Malik2 pages

CWP No.12019 OF 2018 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.12019 OF 2018 DECIDED ON: MAY 14, 2018 RAM CHARAN .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

Present:

Mr. K.R. Dhawan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** JASPAL SINGH, J.

By virtue of instant petition, preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release all the remaining retiral benefits along with interest.

2.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that though legal notice dated 22.02.2018 (P-1) was duly served upon the respondents but till date neither any reply to the said legal notice has been received nor any conscious decision appears to have been taken by the respondents. He further submits that petitioner feels satisfied in case, direction is issued to respondent No.3 to decide legal notice (P-1) in a time bound manner.

3.

Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Executive Officer, Nagar Council Zira, Zira, District Ferozepur to consider the case of the petitioner unfolded in legal notice (P-1) Sonika 2018.05.16 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.12019 OF 2018 --2-- and to make the payment of balance amount, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4.

Similarly, as far as grant of ACP scale on completion of 24 years and 32 years of service is concerned, respondent No.3 is directed to take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order, within a period of two months and if positive response is there, to make the payment of the arrears thereof within a period of next two months from the passing of speaking order. 5.

However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the aforesaid authority or non-compliance of the order, he shall be at liberty to have recourse to the remedies available under law as well as to approach this Court.

MAY 14, 2018 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No Sonika 2018.05.16 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh