Sahil Thakur v. State Of Haryana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30325-2019 Date of decision:13.11.2019 SAHIL THAKUR .....Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .....Respondents **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL ****

Present:

Mr. Nirmaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana.

**** GURVINDER SINGH GILL , J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.742 dated 19.11.2017 under Section 354-A IPC, Police Station DLF-II, Gurugram and proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of a compromise having been effected between the parties.

2.

Vide order dated 18.7.2019 the parties had been directed to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate so as to get the statements recorded with regard to the genuineness of the compromise.

3.

Report of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram has been GAURAV SOROT 2019.11.14 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-: 2 :- CRM-M-30325-2019 received wherein it has been reported that statements of the petitioner as well as of complainant-Sameeksha have been recorded who have stated that they have compromised the matter and that complainant has no objection if the FIR is quashed. It has specifically been opined by learned Magistrate, Gurugram that matter has been settled between the parties amicably/voluntarily without any pressure or coercion. 4.

In view of the aforesaid compromise and bearing in mind the law laid down by Full Bench of this Court in 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, the petition is allowed and FIR No.742 dated 19.11.2017 under Section 354-A IPC, Police Station DLFII, Gurugram and all the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioner.

( GURVINDER SINGH GILL) 13.11.2019 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking?

Yes / No Whether reportable?

Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2019.11.14 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document