High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/17375/2016disposed of

Brahm Parkash And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

2016-08-26Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta,Mrs Justice Daya Chaudhary2 pages

-1CWP No.17375 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.17375 of 2016 Date of decision: 26.08.2016 Brahm Parkash and another ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioners. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to refund the amount of ` 4,70,624/- with interest @ 12%, which has been charged from the petitioners as possession interest. 2.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this writ petition can be disposed of at this stage by permitting the petitioners to file a detailed and comprehensive representation before respondent No.3 raising all the pleas as have been sought to be raised herein. Further prayer has been made that a time bound direction be issued to respondent No.3 to decide the representation after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 3.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, perusing the paper-book and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy, we dispose of this writ petition by permitting the petitioners to file a detailed and comprehensive representation before respondent No.3 Ravinder Singh 2016.08.29 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

-2CWP No.17375 of 2016 within a period of one month from today. It is further directed that if any such representation is filed, same shall be decided by respondent No.3 within next two months after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. It is further directed that in case the petitioners are found entitled to any amount, same shall be released to them within next one month. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) 26.08.2016 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Ravinder Singh 2016.08.29 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document