← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-A/1050/2025allowed

Punjab Agro Foodgrains Corporation Limited v. Rajpal And Another

2025-11-18Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara,Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur2 pages

  CRM-A-1050-2025    CRM-A-1050-2025 PUNJAB AGRO FOOD GRAINS CORPORATION LIMITED VS.

RAJPAL AND ANOTHER

Present:

Ms. Deepika Bagri, Advocate and Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Ms. Pooja Nayar Sharma, DAG, Punjab.

***** CRM-A-1050-2025 Counsel for the applicant submits that they have a very good case on merit and there is sufficient evidence on record which is sufficient for conviction of private respondent. There is no appreciation of evidence in judgment of acquittal dated 25.03.2025. Vakalatnma on behalf of respondent No.1 is taken on record. Counsel appearing for respondent No.1 submits that the judgment of acquittal is well reasoned. He further submits that respondent No.1 has since been retired. Leave to appeal granted.

Registry to assign number to appeal.

Main appeal  Heard.  Admitted.

The accused i.e. respondent No.1, to execute a bond for attendance within two months, undertaking to appear in this Court, in case appeal is allowed. Given above, the accused-respondent No.1 shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Twenty five Thousand only (INR 25,000/-), and furnishing one surety for Rs. Twenty five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty ANJU RANI 2025.11.27 08:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh

  CRM-A-1050-2025    Magistrate. Before accepting the sureties, the concerned Court must satisfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing the accused before the Court.

The furnishing of the personal bonds shall be deemed acceptance of the all stipulations, terms, and conditions of this bail order. Registry to communicate this order to the trial Court without any delay. In case of failure of respondents to furnish bond, the concerned Court shall proceed further in accordance with law.

Given above, respondent No.1 has since retired, pendency of the appeal shall have no consequences against him.

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the accused can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. In case the attesting officer wants to verify the authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 18.11.2025 anju rani ANJU RANI 2025.11.27 08:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh