← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/31009/2024allowed

Robin Brar (Minor) v. State Of Punjab

2024-09-27Ms. Justice Kirti Singh2 pages

CRM-M-31009-2024 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Sr. No.203 CRM-M-31009-2024 Date of decision : 27.09.2024 ROBIN BRAR (MINOR) ..... Petitioner

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH

Present:

Mr. S.S.Behl, Advocate and Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Randhir Singh Thind, DAG, Punjab.

***** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case FIR No.66 dated 30.05.2023, under Sections 382, 323 and 34 IPC (Section 25 of Arms Act added later on), registered at Police Station Khuian Sarwar, District Fazilka. 2.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from HC Avtar Singh of the concerned Police Station, submits that in compliance to the order dated 03.07.2024, the petitioner has joined the investigation and are not required for any further investigation.

3.

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petition is allowed. Order dated 03.07.2024 passed by this Court, is hereby made absolute.

4.

This order should not be treated as "blanket" order. It will not be read granting the petitioner(s) indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any KAVITA NAIN 2024.09.27 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment other incident that involves commission of an offence.

CRM-M-31009-2024 2 5.

This order does not in any manner limit or restrict the rights or duties of the police or investigating agency to investigate into the charges against the petitioner(s).

6.

The accused/petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him or her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

7.

The accused/petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court.

8.

The accused/petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called by the police.

9.

It will be open to the police or the investigating agency to move to this Court for a direction under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C. to arrest the accused, in the event of violation of any term, such as absconding, noncooperating during investigation, evasion, intimidation or inducement to witnesses with a view to influence outcome of the investigation or trial. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 27.09.2024 Kavita Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KAVITA NAIN 2024.09.27 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment