Vijay Kumr @ Razi v. State Of Punjb

 




  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH


(O&M) Date of decision: 08.04.2022
     

...Petitioner

Versus



...Respondent

    
   

         !

" #   $  !  ****   





  #  "#  ! "%&' ( ()* +,-,!!.,.',.,-! "&/&-'0-%'-%1 &21!/.0*(  ! "(3 4 "  3  Vide order dated 10.09.2021 passed by a Coordinate Bench, ad interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner. 5 !"  #  #   ! ! !!-..09.2021# !  Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Jagdish, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is not required for any further investigation.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. MANGAL SINGH 2022.04.08 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

 




 
 In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 10.09.2021 granting ad interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the conditions envisaged in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

  



 

! 

 6  !7#38 97+ 6  #  8 97+ MANGAL SINGH 2022.04.08 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document