Hassan Khan v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CRM-A-1526-2019 - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-A-1526-2019 Decided on : 29.10.2024 Hassan Khan . . . Appellant(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. R.S. Cheema, Sr. Advocate with Mr. A.S. Cheema, Advoate for the appellant(s).

Mr. Abhinash Sain, DAG-cum-Public Prosecutor, Haryana. **** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA , J. (Oral) 1.

Learned Senior counsel for the appellant submits that while he does not press the present appeal, certain facts needs to be noted that supplementary charge-sheet issued in terms of the investigation conducted, on account of the orders passed by this Court. 2.

The said supplementary charge-sheet and proceedings were kept pending while the learned Judge, based on the earlier charge-sheet has acquitted the three persons, who were not even named in the FIR. While he does not press this appeal against the said persons, he prays that the directions be issued to the concerned Trial Court to pass an independent judgment without being influenced by the judgment passed in the subject matter of the present appeal.

3.

We, accordingly, dismissed the appeal as not pressed. Needless to say that the learned Judge, who would conduct the JAWALA RAM 2024.11.04 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-A-1526-2019 - 2 - trial on the basis of supplementary charge-sheet would act in accordance with law independently and reach to the independent conclusion. Misc. application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE October 29, 2024 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2024.11.04 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document