← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/13927/2017dismissed

Harsheel v. Govt. Medical College & Hospital, Sector-32, Chandigarh And ANR

2017-08-18Ms. Justice Navita Singh,Mr. Justice Tejinder Singh Dhindsa2 pages

CWP-13927-2017 -1HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13927-2017 Date of Decision: August 18, 2017 Dr.Harsheel .....Petitioner

Versus

Govt.Medical College & Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mrs.Anu Chatrath, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Stuti Monga, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ........

SURYA KANT, J.

The time schedule prescribed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court for completion of admission process for Post Graduate (Broad Speciality) Medical Courses in Ashish Ranjan and others vs Union of India and others decided on January 18, 2016 (I.A.No.7 & 8 in Writ Petition (Civil) No.76 of 2015), by all means is 31st May of the year. [2] The petitioner is an aspirant for admission to Post Graduate Course, i.e. MD/MS against the seats which admittedly fell vacant on 12/13.06.2017 and 16.06.2017. In our considered view, the authorities have rightly declined to grant admission in the light of the mandatory time Meenu 2017.08.22 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh schedule prescribed by the Apex Court. No direction contrary to the said

CWP-13927-2017 -2time schedule can be issued by this Court as well. [3] Dismissed.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE August 18, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.08.22 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh