Ravi v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-48798 of 2019 and CRM-M-32161 of 2020 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 212/2 CRM-M-48798 of 2019 Date of Decision:25.10.2021 Krishan @ Nanha ...... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ...... Respondent 2) CRM-M-32161 of 2020 Ravi ...... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ...... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH

Present:

Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner in CRM-M-48798 of 2019.

 

    







 ! "#$  ***** AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J. (ORAL) ase heard via    % Vide these petitions, the petitioners seek the concession of 'regular bail' under the provisions of Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., upon FIR no.1129, dated DINESH 2021.10.26 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-48798 of 2019 and CRM-M-32161 of 2020 -210.08.2018, having been registered at Police Station City Panipat, alleging therein the commission of offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 148, 149 and 120B of the IPC. On the last date of hearing, learned State counsel had been asked to take specific instructions as to the exact stage of the trial. Today he submits on instructions from ASI Arvind Kumar, that out of 19 prosecution witnesses 3 have been examined so far. Upon further query, he submits that the petitioners have been in custody for about 3 years and 2 months now.

&' % ( % %   $)  ( % $

      the petitions are allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, subject to their furnishing adequate bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court.

($ '   

).

October 25, 2021 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) dinesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No DINESH 2021.10.26 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document