Sajjan Singh Yadav v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2023:PHHC:092741 218-2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16788-2020 DECIDED ON: 18.07.2023 SAJJAN SINGH YADAV .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL

Present:

Mr. Manoj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocates for respondents No.2 to 4.

***** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate wrti/order or direction, for setting aside/quashing of impugned orders dated 03.10.2018 (Annexure P-4) and order dated 20.03.2020 (Annexure P-5) issued by Aministrator HSVP Gurugram and also prayer for staying the operation of repatriation orders dated 03.10.2018 (Annexure P-4) and order dated 20.03.2020 (Annexure P-5). Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 vehemently contended that the petition is not maintainable, wherein, no prejudice has been caused on deputation to stay with the HSVP. The petitioner do not have any legal right and has been rightly repatriation, directly in the light of criminal KUSUM 2023.07.21 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD

2023:PHHC:092741 CWP-16788-2020 -2prosecution pending against the petitioner. Without going into the merits of the case, since the petitioner do not have a right to continue in the office of HSVP, Gurugram on deputation for an indefinite period, this petition lacks merit and the same is accordingly dismissed.

(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 18.07.2023 JUDGE Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2023.07.21 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD