Naresh Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP-17572-2016 -1HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17572-2016 Date of Decision: January 17, 2017 Naresh Kumar .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.Inder Pal Goyat, Advocate for the petitioner.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioner claims that with a view to omit some of the categories of employees from feeder cadre, to whom promotional benefits are admissible under the Haryana Health Directorate Ministerial (Group C) Service Rules, 1983, a new set of Rules was drafted in the year 1998. Those draft Rules, it is alleged, have been kept under the carpet without any valid reason and are being not notified due to which the petitioner and other similarly placed employees are suffering in the matter of timely promotions. Since the formulation, repeal or amendment of Statutory Rules is an exercise which falls within the domain of the Rule Making Authority, we decline to express any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim and rather deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to Meenu 2017.01.30 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CWP-17572-2016 -2the respondent-authorities to treat this petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law as early as possible and preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE January 17, 2017 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.01.30 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh