← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/8574/2021disposed of

Simranjeet Kaur And ANR v. State Of Haryana And Others

2021-09-09Mr. Justice Raj Mohan Singh2 pages

CRWP No. 8574 of 2021 -1117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. 8574 of 2021 Date of Decision: 09.09.2021 Simranjeet Kaur and another -Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others -Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH

Present:

Mr. Sachin Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioners.

**** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral) The case has been taken up for hearing through video-conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this is the first marriage between the petitioners. Petitioners have prayed for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents for protecting their civil/personal rights and liberties from being invaded by the private respondents. Petitioners are alleged to have solemnized marriage on 01.09.2021 on attaining the age of majority. They feel reasonable apprehension and threat perception at the hands of the private respondents and pray that their personal/civil rights be not violated by them. Precisely, in the context of aforesaid relief, petitioners JYOTI YADAV 2021.09.09 14:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP No. 8574 of 2021 -2have approached the Superintendent of Police, Karnal and Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra/respondents No.2 and 3 by way of representation dated 03.09.2021.

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 4.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Rajat Gautam, D.A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of State-respondents No.1 to 4.

At this stage, without meaning anything in the context of validity of marriage and majority of the petitioners, it would be just and appropriate to direct respondent No.2 to look into the grievance/representation of the petitioners (if any received) and pass an appropriate order on merits in accordance with law. Petitioners may supplement their representation by way of fresh representation. Respondent No.2 would pass necessary order without being influenced by any pleadings made in the petition. This order shall not debar the official respondents from proceeding against any of the parties, if they are involved in any other case. It would be appreciated if the needful is done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

September 09, 2021 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) Jyoti Sharma JUDGE JYOTI YADAV 2021.09.09 14:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document