High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/14076/2017disposed of

Shivpaul Singla v. Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd Thr Managing Director And ANR

2017-07-03Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 133 Civil Writ Petition No.14076 of 2017 (O & M) Date of Decision: July 03, 2017 Shivpaul Singla & another ..... PETITIONERS

VERSUS

Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. & another ..... RESPONDENTS . . .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH . . .

PRESENT: - Mr. Puran Chand Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . .

Jaspal Singh, J 1.

By virtue of instant writ petition preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioners have sought issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus/direction to make the payment of interest or delay payments for the period of delay as per provisions under Rule 9.13 of the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume - II; Government Instructions issued vide letter No.1/65/09-1155 dated February 18, 2010; and ratio of judgments delivered in cases A.S. Randhawa vs. State of Punjab & others, 1997 (3) SCT 468; Vijay L. Mehrotra vs. State of U.P., 2000 (4) SCT 267 and CWP No.7621 of 2002 titled Parshotam Dass vs. State of Punjab & others, decided on March 01, 2016; and CWP No.10401 of 2016 titled Sushil Singla vs. State of Punjab, decided on April 25, 2017. Avin Kumar 2017.07.05 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.14076 of 2017 [2] 2.

At the very outset of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners would be satisfied in case instant petition is treated as a representation and be sent to respondent No.2 - District Manager, Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Patiala, to decide the grouse raised in it within a specified period. 3.

The instant petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 - The District Manager, Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Patiala, to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in this writ petition, which has been treated as a representation on his behalf & take an appropriate decision in the light of Rules/Instructions/judgments, referred to in Para 1 of this judgment as well as latest law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

(Jaspal Singh) July 03, 2017 Judge avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No Avin Kumar 2017.07.05 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document