Himanshu Alias Himanshu Hooda v. State Of Punjab And Another
!
""# $% %&"' ( )
# *+ , -.$+$
!"
# $% !!& %#' ( "
) #% !"
*
) + !"
, ----
/+ . ( % 0 ( % (
%
123
+ 4,)
%
3
)
)% ' 56, 3 21 %
78
+, 3 )
,4)
!
% 9:; 4 56< ) < ) < 4< ( % 0(
'
%14 = 4
) /
/
/ ( & > 4 ,4) (
:?;@ ) /
( % (
"
4
< '44 )
4
) )/
/
/%' A% 4 8 7 = 4 < <4 ) )
/ ) = 4
% " 4
'
"
/ <
// ) <
/( %
% )
/ < '
% ) 4
" % < /
/
% < 4
= ) ) ) 4 / % ' " = )
/
" ,4) %#'
33 <
%)) < "
) " ) 4
% " /
%
/
( < " ( % 0 ( % (
' %) /
!
%/ ) ' / = < / ) % %
% 1 )
%
(
<
< ) !)%/
' < (
/ <
< % 4 <
= (
/ ) 4
"
!
71 < A%
+?
<
/
( %0 (
<'
% ) 4
%)) )
'
5 4 / <
'
<
56 ' ) 3.
Learned counsel for petitioner argued that present petitioner was granted interim bail from 12.06.2025 to 03.07.2025 vide order dated 11.06.2025. The complainant was six months pregnant and present
3 petitioner was ready to perform marriage. It is pointed out that in pursuance of order dated 11.06.2025, petitioner and victim have performed marriage. After interim relief, petitioner had surrendered in the jail. In the light of aforesaid factual position, no purpose would be served by sending him behind the bars. Therefore, his regular bail petition may be allowed. 4.
Status report is filed in this case confirming the registration of FIR as well as interim relief granted in favour of petitioner. As per the custody certificate, petitioner had surrendered back on the date fixed i.e. 03.07.2025. Learned counsel representing State as well as learned counsel representing respondent No.2/victim confirmed the marriage between the parties.
5.
I have considered the aforesaid factual position. As referred above, present petitioner and the said victim have performed marriage. Petitioner is ready to abide by the terms of bail order. During interim bail, petitioner did not misuse the concession granted in his favour. Therefore, without going on the merits of the case, )% '
'4 .(
< ( ' ' %
) ' '
% 4 '
> %B%4*%)
7 Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly as well. 0
1
)B D B, ' D B,