Shanti Sawroop And ORS. v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

CWP-17696-2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17696-2016 Date of decision: 30.08.2016 Shanti Sawroop and others ..... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioners have approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to demolish the dwelling houses of the inhabitants of Naga Baba 2D Colony. Further a writ of certiorari has been sought for quashing the show-cause notices dated 29.07.2016 (Annexure P-13).

2.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in pursuance to the show-cause notices dated 29.07.2016 (Annexure P-13), the petitioners have submitted representation dated 29.07.2016 (Annexure P-14) before respondent No. 3. It was urged that the same has not been decided so far.

3.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, perusing the Rishu Kataria 2016.08.31 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CWP-17696-2016 -2paper-book and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy, we dispose of this petition at this stage by directing respondent No.3 to take a decision on the representation dated 29.07.2016 (Annexure P-14) in accordance with law by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. ( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE August 30, 2016 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2016.08.31 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document