High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/17756/2016disposed of

Ranjana Devi v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2016-08-30Mr. Justice T.H.B. Chalapathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 17756 of 2016 Date of Decision: 30.8.2016 Ranajana Devi .....Petitioner Vs.

State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present :

Mr. Dinesh Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL) Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this Court, by way of instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the genuine grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed by the respondent authorities, she finally approached respondent No.2 by way of self contained representation dated 2.6.2016 (Annexure P-3), but the same is also pending decision. He further submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case the Chief Engineer, Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, Transmission System Organization (Transo Co), Patialarespondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide her representation, Amit Kumar 2016.08.31 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document within a reasonable time.

Civil Writ Petition No. 17756 of 2016 Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, lest it should prejudice the rights of either of the parties, the Chief Engineer, Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, Transmission System Organization (Transo Co), Patiala-respondent No.2 is directed to look into the matter, consider the grievance of the petitioner, raised vide her representation dated 2.6.2016 (Annexure P-3) and decide the same, at an early date by passing an appropriate order thereon, strictly in accordance with law, but in any case within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

With the abovesaid observations made and directions issued, present petition stands disposed of.

(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE 30.8 .2016 Ak Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Amit Kumar 2016.08.31 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document