State Of Haryana v. Bhagwan Dass And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4617 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 State of Haryana through Land Acquisition Collector, Faridabad .......... Petitioner

Versus

Bhagwan Dass and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present:

Mr. Abhinav Kalia, DAG, Haryana for the petitioner.

**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition, challenge has been laid to an order dated 29.04.2022 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Faridabad-cum-Executing Court, whereby the private respondent Nos. 1 to 8-landowners were awarded similar amount of compensation in terms of judgment dated 10.12.2014 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 11042 of 2014, titled "Satbir Singh Versus State of Haryana", determining the market value at the rate of Rs. 175/- per square yard in favour of their co-sharers. [2] I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the records. A perusal thereof shows that the impugned order by the learned Executing Court was passed in April 2022, however, the present revision petition came to be preferred after a period of more than four years. Besides it, the release of benefits of similar market value by the learned Executing Court in favour of co-sharers, who failed to file any objections DINESH KUMAR 2026.06.01 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CR No. 4617 of 2026 (O&M) [2] under Section 18 or application under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 already stands decided/approved by the Hon'ble Apex Court vide decision dated 13.01.2026 passed in Civil Appeal No(s).391-398 of 2026 (@SLP (C) No(S).4532-4539 of 2023), titled "Ramphal & Ors. Versus Haryana State Industrial And Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited & Ors".

[3] In such circumstances, at this belated stage after more than four years, challenge to the order dated 29.04.2022 passed by the learned Executing Court, being hit by delay and latches, calls for no interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Consequently, the present petition is hereby dismissed.

[4] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.

May 29, 2026 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) 'dk kamra'

JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2026.06.01 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document