Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.1882 of 2015 Date of Decision.04.02.2015 Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary .......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner will have no cause for complaint through a writ petition for electric installations which are said to have been made on his property. The provisions of the Telegraphs Act which are applicable for laying transmission lines provide for a Forum before the District Magistrate to stake a claim or objection and any such objection or claim will be addressed by the District Magistrate and he is competent to pass such an appropriate order. This issue has been considered by this Court in Kanwar Singh Vs. Union of India 2011(4) PLR 65.

2.

The writ petition is dismissed but with liberty to approach the District Magistrate for appropriate redressal of his grievance. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE February 04, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.02.06 11:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document