Monika Jain And ANR. v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

CWP-18852-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-18852-2015 Date of Decision: July 11, 2016 Monika Jain and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DARSHAN SINGH

Present:

Mohd. Shameem, Advocate, for Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

SURYA KANT, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel on instructions from Shri Ashok Kumar, Patwari, Village Badshahpur, District Gurgaon, states that petitioner No. 1 (Monika Jain) has received compensation of Rs. 1,77,66,136/- and petitioner No. 2 (Madhu Jain) has received compensation of Rs. 1,88,28,518/-, through RTGS on 4.2.2016. A photostat copy of the Register maintained by the office of the Land Acquisition Collector, Gurgaon, containing such entries has also been placed on record and the same is Mark as 'A'. Since the petitioners have received compensation of the PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.07.20 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CWP-18852-2015 acquired land assessed under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehablitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, their challenge to the acquisition has been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly.

(SURYA KANT) JUDGE (DARSHAN SINGH) JUDGE July 11, 2016 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.07.20 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document