Indu Mehta v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P 17974-2016 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.01.2019 Indu Mehta ......Petitioner versus State of Haryana and another

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. G.S. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, AAG, Haryana Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate for respondent No. 3 Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

**** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents states that the present petition be dismissed as having become rendered infructuous, as the petitioner stood retired after attaining the age of superannuation and has been paid all the retiral benefits.

Dismissed as having become rendered infructuous. January 16, 2019 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Gaurav Arora 2019.01.18 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh