← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/29062/2019allowed

Randip Singh v. State Of Haryana

2019-07-16Mr. Justice Manoj Bajaj2 pages

CRM-M-29062-2019 (O & M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29062-2019 (O & M) Date of Decision:16.07.2019 Randip Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ BAJAJ

Present:

Mr. Gurinder Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, DAG, Haryana.

*** MANOJ BAJAJ, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.249 dated 14.06.2016, under Section 406 IPC, registered at Police Station Sushant Lok, Gurugram, Haryana.

The FIR was registered on the complaint given by Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Society Gurugram on the ground that the office bearers of Ram Shanti Cooperative Group Housing Society, Gurugram did not hand over the record of the Society to the Inspector and recommendation was made for registration of the case. On the basis of the said complaint., the FIR was registered for the offence punishable under Section 406 IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner Sheetal Gawri 2019.07.18 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh was falsely indicted in the case, who was in technological consultancy

CRM-M-29062-2019 (O & M) -2business. According to him, the petitioner was arrested on 30.04.2019 and the challan stands filed in the case qua him on 24.06.2019. He submits that actual office bearers, who have been accused of not handing over the record are yet to be arrested. He submits that further custody of the petitioner may not be justified.

On the other hand, bail application is opposed by learned State counsel. It is not disputed that the investigation qua him is complete and challan stands filed.

Considering the above background and the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate, further detention of the petitioner may not be justified. Therefore, without meaning any expression on the merits of the case, it is ordered that the petitioner be released on regular bail subject to his furnishing requisite bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned.

The petition is allowed.

16.07.2019 (MANOJ BAJAJ) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No Sheetal Gawri 2019.07.18 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh