← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/16846/2022disposed of

Amarjit Singh v. Central University Of Haryana Mahendergarh And ANR.

2023-10-09Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal2 pages

CM-4146 & 4147-CWP-2023 in/and CWP-16846-2022 -12023:PHHC:130638

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 138+247 CM-4146 & 4147-CWP-2023 in/and CWP-16846-2022 Date of Decision : 09.10.2023 Dr. Amarjit Singh ......... Petitioner

Versus

Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh and another ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Dr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate and Mr.Pankaj Attri, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Ravindra Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate for Mr. Salil Sabhlok, Advocate for respondent No.2-UGC.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral) CM-4146-CWP-2023 Application is allowed as prayed for.

CM-4147-CWP-2023 Prayer in this application is for placing on record the reply by way of affidavit alongwith Annexures.

Allowed as prayed for and the reply by way of affidavit alongwith Annexures is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. ANJU GOEL 2023.10.09 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CM-4146 & 4147-CWP-2023 in/and CWP-16846-2022 -22023:PHHC:130638 Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place. CWP-16846-2022 The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India is seeking directions to UGC to extent relaxation of 5% at Bachelor's as well as Master's level as he is a differently abled person.

The UGC in its reply has confirmed that as per clause 3.4 of 2018 Regulations, a candidate suffering from disability as mentioned in the said paragraph, is entitled to relaxation of 5% marks. The petitioner in terms of interim order passed by this Court was allowed to participate in the selection process, however, he was not selected on account of low merit. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that claim of the petitioner for the appointment to the post in question has rendered infructuous, however, petitioner in future may be considered in terms of clause 3.4 of 2018 Regulations.

The authorities are bound to consider claim of the petitioner in terms of 3.4 of 2018 regulations, if found eligible, against the post, if any, advertised by the respondents.

The petition stands disposed of.

( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) 09.10.2023 JUDGE anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No ANJU GOEL 2023.10.09 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document